Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears sharp cost increases on TDOT projects; members urge city to share overages
Summary
Staff reported that estimates for two state‑administered road projects have risen substantially; committee members discussed asking the city of Hendersonville to share any additional county costs and noted funding would depend on approval through the MPO process.
County staff told the General Operations Committee that updated estimates for multiple state or state-managed road projects have risen substantially since initial budgets were set, and committee members discussed asking the city of Hendersonville to share any additional county costs.
The committee was told that the SR‑258 (Griggs Creek) project’s estimate increased substantially in recent updates and that the county’s current planning estimate of its share is roughly 20 percent of the construction cost, subject to Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) approval. "The county right now, this is just the estimate responsible for just short of $1,800,000. However, after speaking with the planning department, they're supposed to go to the MPO to get the additional funding where we value be responsible for 20% of the project, not the full 1.8," staff said.
Separately, the Drakes Creek project originally budgeted at about $2.2 million was described in committee discussion as now estimated in the low‑to‑mid‑$3 million range. Committee members noted the estimate changes may reflect multiyear delays; one commissioner observed the original estimate was several years old and that costs often escalate while projects await right‑of‑way or construction phases.
No final funding commitment was made in committee. One commissioner proposed formalizing a request that Hendersonville bear an equal share of any cost increases for a project the city had asked the state to advance; committee members discussed but did not record a final vote to obligate additional county funds. Staff emphasized that project estimates will change until construction bids are received and that potential county exposure depends on MPO or TDOT allocations.
Why it matters: rising estimates could require the county to allocate additional capital funds or ask partner governments to increase contributions, and the committee said it wants the city to share responsibility for overages when a city‑initiated project leads to higher costs.
Next steps: staff will continue to track MPO and TDOT funding decisions; the committee asked that city partners be approached about sharing overages before any county budget commitment is made.
