Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Long Term Care Managed Care topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners warn proposed managed‑care shift could cut federal funds for nursing homes
Summary
Officials told county commissioners that a legislative move to place nursing‑home and home‑community services into managed care could reduce federal reimbursements to nursing homes and counties by roughly $100 million, and commissioners described the risk that smaller nursing homes could close under such a change.
County officials told commissioners that a legislative proposal to study moving long‑term care into managed care could remove large federal funding streams that currently support nursing homes, and they urged caution as the bill moves through the legislature.
Why it matters: County officials said shifting nursing‑home payments into a managed‑care model would strip federal flows now supporting nursing homes and county programs, with potential consequences for nursing‑home viability and county budgets.
What county officials said A county official summarized the county’s estimate that a push to place all home‑and‑community‑based services and nursing‑home clients into managed care could remove about $100,000,000 in federal funding from the state reimbursement system. The official said that the county currently receives federal support that includes a provider assessment commonly referred to in the meeting as the “bed tax” and proportionate share pool (PSP) funds, and that those flows would not continue under a managed‑care conversion.
Officials described prior reports and analyses the county prepared (citing work dating to 2014 and a final report filed in February 2018). They said counties will present that information to legislators as the bill advances and that sponsors of the bill may not fully appreciate the potential fiscal impact on counties and nursing‑home operators.
Discussion of eligibility, care needs and likely outcomes Commissioners and the official argued the nursing‑home population today is, on average, sicker and more costly to care for than in prior decades because people now leave hospitals sooner. The official said average lengths of stay are shorter and that large shares of current nursing‑home residents are on hospice or require high‑acuity care; those conditions complicate efforts to shift care to home‑and‑community settings without increased total spending.
Officials noted states that have pursued managed‑care approaches experienced mixed results and cited Arizona as an example of a problematic rollout. County officials said any move toward managed care would likely require new revenue sources to replace federal funding otherwise available under the current system, and that privatization would introduce profit margins and new regulatory complexity.
Discussion versus decisions The meeting record shows discussion of the legislative proposal and county staff and commissioners’ intent to present county reports to the legislature; there was no formal county vote reported on a lobbying stance at this meeting.
Ending County officials said they will track the bill and present prior county analyses to legislators as the process continues.
