Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Planning Retaining Walls topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission presses major revisions for 85 Vestal after repeated reviews; concerns over density, retaining walls
Summary
Commissioners asked the applicant for 85 Vestal to make substantial changes to reduce overall massing and visible retaining walls, and to coordinate that work with related applications on the same property.
Get email alerts on the Site Planning Retaining Walls topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Historic District Commission on Aug. 5 signaled it needed more substantial revisions to a proposal at 85 Vestal after multiple prior hearings, listing density, large retaining walls and the composition of several structures on the lot as unresolved issues.
The applicant presented site sections, revised ridge poles and proposed planting to reduce visibility from Dukes Road. "This side section shows the view from Dukes Road and the proposed plan planting that it will be on the property line, which will block the view at the house," the applicant said. Neighbors, however, urged the commission to require a different layout to preserve the area’s low, camp‑style character and to avoid tall retaining walls.
Commissioners and multiple neighbors raised persistent concerns: the lot includes multiple new structures and a long north elevation that is highly visible from below; the pool location creates a large retaining wall; and cut‑and‑fill grading is extensive. "It's just too much on this property," a commissioner said. Several commissioners asked for a clear reduction in building massing, reconsideration of pool placement and softer landscaping to limit visibility from Dukes Road.
The commission voted to require "major changes" to the site layout and to direct the applicant to revise the whole site plan; commissioners also agreed that the related applications for nearby parcels should be considered together because the overall layout of buildings on the parent lot affects visibility and massing.
Next steps: the applicant will return with revised site plans that reduce massing, reposition or remove the pool to eliminate large retaining walls where possible, and present coordinated plans for related applications on the property.

