This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
County prosecutors appeared before the Judiciary Committee to support House Bill 252, which would revise Ohio burglary statutes by removing the requirement that an unlawful entry be proved to have occurred “by force, stealth or deception” in order to convict for burglary and related offenses.
Why it matters: Prosecutors told the committee the Ohio Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in State v. Bertram created a legal gap in which defendants who unlawfully enter occupied structures can avoid burglary charges if the state cannot prove the specific manner of entry. The sponsors and prosecutors said HB252 would align Ohio with other states that define burglary by unlawful entry with criminal intent rather than by the means of entry.
What prosecutors testified
- A prosecutor who presented the bill said the facts of State v. Bertram — in which an individual walked into an occupied garage and took property but the conviction was overturned because the court found the means of entry were not proven — showed the current statutory element can produce outcomes that feel at odds with victims’ expectations and public safety goals.
- The witness said HB252 would preserve the requirement that the entry be unlawful and that the offender intend to commit a crime inside the structure; it would simply remove force/stealth/deception as a separate element that must be proved.
- A second prosecutor echoed that jury instructions and the range of possible factual patterns make the force/stealth/deception element difficult to prove consistently and urged the committee to adopt the statutory change.
Committee action
The committee received the proponents’ testimony and took no vote during the hearing. Prosecutors recommended the committee adopt HB252 to reduce inconsistent outcomes and better protect occupants of homes and other occupied structures.
Ending
Prosecutors asked legislators to support HB252 so the law treats unlawful entry with criminal intent consistently regardless of how the entry occurred; the committee did not take a vote at the hearing.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,057 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit