Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accessory Dwelling And Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners deny extra‑vehicle request and accessory‑structure occupancy at Janet Way property, allow existing household occupancy for 12 months
Summary
At the Aug. 5 hearing, the Planning Commission denied a request to increase on‑site vehicles and to occupy an accessory structure at 4943 Janet Way, while allowing current household occupancy to continue for 12 months; the accessory unit must remain storage-only and vehicles must be reduced to code limits.
Aug. 5 — The county Planning Commission on Tuesday denied a property owner's request to use an accessory structure as a dwelling and to increase the number of vehicles allowed at a residence on Janet Way, while permitting the current household occupancy level to remain for 12 months.
Applicant Brandon Lorenzo told the commission he intends to use the accessory structure only for storage and was waiting for an electrician to complete permits. He said the household is multigenerational and that vehicle counts can spike at night to eight or nine vehicles. Code enforcement reported a complaint on Feb. 17, 2025, and early‑morning inspections found a majority‑of‑week violation with roughly eight vehicles on site. No citation was issued while the LUP was pending.
Commissioner Massey moved to deny the request for accessory‑structure occupancy and to deny an increase in allowable vehicles. He amended the motion on the record to allow the existing six physical occupants to remain for 12 months, to deny commercial or residential occupancy of the accessory structure (the structure may be used for storage only), and to deny any increase in allowable vehicles; commissioners said the household must reduce parked vehicles to comply with parking standards (commissioners stated that would require reducing to five vehicles). Commissioner Bloyne seconded the amended motion. The motion carried.
Code enforcement officer Yalisa Foster described the inspection timeline and the vehicle counts that prompted the complaint. Commissioners expressed concern about visual impacts and neighborhood disturbance from high vehicle density and emphasized the need to comply with parking and occupancy rules.
The commission's action provides a 12‑month period for the household arrangement to continue but denies the requested change in use for the accessory structure and the request for more parked vehicles. Staff will monitor compliance and may resume enforcement if violations continue.
