Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the License Revocation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board revokes license for Elton Campbell, finding nuisance under municipal code

5532907 · August 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Greenwood board found that a business operated by Elton Campbell was conducted so as to constitute a nuisance and voted to revoke the license, citing municipal code section 4-104(b)(5).

The Greenwood Board of Public Works and Safety on Aug. 4 voted to revoke a license held by Elton Campbell after finding that the business had been operated in a manner that constituted a nuisance and that the licensee had committed an act of battery on a resident.

During a hearing on the license, Chief Fiseman described an altercation and said the incident included an arrest for disorderly conduct and battery. The board discussed whether the conduct constituted a nuisance; Paul (board member) asked that any motion include a specific finding that the business operation constituted a nuisance. The chair read the municipal code citation into the record: “The business, being operated by mister Campbell, has been conducted in the manner so as to constitute a nuisance and decline by our city code. It's a violation of municipal code section 4 dash 1 0 4 b 5,” the chair said.

A motion to revoke the license and to find the business a nuisance was made and seconded; the board voted by voice and the motion passed. The board did not record any conditional remedial steps; staff indicated the revocation was effective as a board action and would be processed through the city’s licensing enforcement procedures.

The board noted the action was taken under the city code provision cited and that public safety concerns — including that the incident involved battery on a resident — were a factor in the board’s decision.