Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Waukegan committees and council approve worker‑comp settlements, zoning items, SRO agreement and engineering contract
Summary
On Aug. 4 committees and the city council approved four worker‑comp settlements, a public‑works engineering contract, zoning variances and conditional use permits, liquor‑license increases and an SRO intergovernmental agreement. Several items drew questions from aldermen about enforcement, staffing and applicant details.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A set of resolutions, permits and contracts were approved at Waukegan committee and council meetings on Aug. 4. Below are the items the record shows were moved, seconded and voted on, followed by brief context or notable discussion. Where the transcript records a vote tally, it is included.
Votes at a glance
1) Police department worker‑comp settlement — claim 24WC21460 — approved Motion: first by Alderman Turner; second by Alderman Donaworth. Vote: Chair Bolton Aye; Vice Chair Martinez Aye; Alderman Turner Aye; Alderman Florian Aye; Alderman Donaworth Aye. Outcome: approved. Amount: corrected in committee to $47,066.40 (transcript shows an initial reading then a corrected figure). Context: Item carried on roll call; committee packet and email were referenced by staff before the vote.
2) Police department worker‑comp settlement — claim 24WC029339241008W001 — approved Motion: moved and seconded on the floor (second recorded as Alderman Martinez). Vote: unanimous in committee. Outcome: approved. Amount: not to exceed $89,676.13.
3) Public works worker‑comp settlement — claim 25WC01193250113W006 — approved Motion: moved and seconded in committee. Vote: unanimous in committee. Outcome: approved. Amount: not to exceed $16,008.80.
4) Release and settlement agreement involving the City of Waukegan and David Mahoney and Cassie Bostick (Bostick) — approved Motion: first by Alderman Martinez; second by Alderman Turner. Vote: unanimous in committee. Outcome: approved. Amount: not to exceed $350,000.
5) Engineering services agreement — Infrastructure Engineering Inc. — metro station retaining wall — approved (Public Works & Infrastructure Committee) Motion: first by Alderman Newsome; second by Alderman Guzman. Vote: passed (roll call recorded in committee). Outcome: approved. Amount: not to exceed $121,000. Context: Item approved by the Public Works & Infrastructure Committee; packet materials were in the agenda.
6) Zoning — variance for accessory structure setback, 705 Chestnut St. (Zoning calendar #2786) — approved (Community Development Committee) Motion: first by Alderman Martinez; second by Alderman Hayes. Vote: unanimous in committee. Outcome: approved.
7) Zoning — conditional use permit for motor vehicle repair/service with lot‑size variance at 4840 Grand Ave (Zoning calendar #2787) — approved (Community Development Committee) Motion: first by Alderman Martinez; second by Alderman Hayes. Vote: 4–1 (Alderman Hayes voted No). Outcome: approved. Context: Planning staff described site improvements including landscaping and eight striped parking spaces plus one accessible stall; staff said the landscaping must be installed within 24 months. Council members pressed planning staff about enforcement capacity: code enforcement and licensing officers are the tools to address future code violations; aldermen were advised to file complaints to build adjudication records.
8) Liquor license — increase Class F‑1 package (beer/wine) license by one for SRand Gas Station LLC d/b/a BP, 2601 Grand Ave — approved (Community Development Committee) Motion: first by Alderman Martinez; second recorded. Vote: 4–1 (Alderman Hayes voted No). Outcome: approved. Context: Licensing staff agreed to correct an address inconsistency on the application before the item reaches the full council; the applicant said he would provide a corrected home address for renewal correspondence.
9) Liquor license — increase Class K (catering) license by one for College of Lake County, 34 N. Sheridan Rd. — approved (Community Development Committee) Motion: first by Alderman Martinez; second by Alderman Bolton. Vote: unanimous in committee. Outcome: approved.
10) Intergovernmental agreement (IGA) for school resource officers (SROs) — Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 (District 64 in transcript) — approved (City Council consent agenda) Motion: first by Alderman Newsome; second by Alderman Martinez. Vote: recorded roll call showed majority approval; Alderman Guzman voted No. Outcome: approved. Amount recorded in the IGA exhibit: $146,666 (prorated officer salary contribution cited by deputy chief). Context: Aldermen questioned cost allocation and fairness for residents whose property taxes do not support the district schools; proponents emphasized student safety and timely agreements after prior communication issues.
Notes, clarifications and process points
- All items above are recorded from committee reports and the council consent agenda on Aug. 4. Motion language in minutes sometimes omits exact legal titles; the article lists the action as reflected in the committee or council roll calls.
- For zoning and CUP items, planning staff said enforcement rests with the licensing and code enforcement divisions and that complaints from neighbors/aldermen help build cases for administrative adjudication.
- Liquor license approvals included a staff commitment to correct an applicant address entry that staff and committee members noted was inconsistent on the application form.
Sources and attribution
Speakers on the record for these actions include: Mayor Sam Cunningham; Deputy Chief (police); committee chairs and aldermen who made motions and cast roll‑call votes (Aldermen Turner, Newsome, Martinez, Guzman, Bolton, Donaworth, Florian, Hayes, Felix). The transcript records the roll calls and the motions as indicated above.
Ending
Several aldermen used the committee discussions to press for better enforcement tools, additional staffing for code enforcement, clearer licensing procedures and corrected applicant records. Where the transcript records follow‑up directions (for example, staff correcting an application address), staff agreed to make the fix before the item appears on the full council calendar.

