Lafayette council approves ordinance allowing up to five hens per household, sets one-year sunset and permit rules

5532637 · August 5, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After hours of public comment split between neighbors and supporters, the common council voted 5-3 to approve an ordinance permitting up to five hens per property (no roosters), requiring a free permit, identification of birds and a one-year sunset for review; animal-control staff described complaint-driven enforcement procedures.

LAFAYETTE — The Malawithia common council voted 5-3 to approve a city ordinance that allows residents to keep up to five hens per property, bans roosters, and imposes permitting and confinement requirements, including a one-year sunset clause for council review.

Council summary and key provisions Council members summarized the ordinance before the vote: residents may keep up to five hens, roosters are prohibited, coops and pens must be set back at least 10 feet from neighboring property lines, and a free permit will be required so the city can track locations. The ordinance includes a one-year sunset so the council may revisit the policy after initial implementation.

Why the ordinance mattered at the meeting Supporters said the rules give homeowners a regulated way to raise a modest number of hens for food and education; opponents warned of noise, sanitation, predators, pests and enforcement challenges in compact neighborhoods.

What animal-control staff said Sarah Goins, chief animal control officer for the city of Lafayette, said the city—s animal-control team supports regulated chicken ownership because an ordinance helps officers enforce standards. Goins described enforcement procedure: animal-control investigations are complaint-driven via the police department nonemergency line (option 6), officers inspect coops against the checklist, and owners may be required to correct violations or rehome animals; in extreme cases the ordinance allows seizure.

Public reaction Speakers were sharply divided by neighborhood and concern type: - Supporters, including Christine Poquette and Claire Freeman, said regulated hens improve food access, allow backyard education, and that comparable ordinances in other Indiana cities have not produced large citywide problems. - Opponents, including speakers from Highland Park and other neighborhoods, raised public-safety and nuisance concerns: Stephanie Hange and Jen Stevens said compact lots and small yards make setbacks and coop concealment difficult, and cited a recent house fire in a hidden chicken coop. Bernie Kroll warned of increased rodent and predator activity and questioned a free-permit model as unenforceable.

Council debate and vote Councilmembers discussed the prior public survey, enforcement capacity and neighborhood differences. Several members said the one-year sunset provision was an important safeguard. The council then voted by roll call: Plinker (Aye), Snyder (Aye), Reynolds (No), Weese (Aye), Brown (Aye), Eulersmeyer (Aye), Williamson (No), Downing (No). The ordinance passed 5 to 3.

What passed and next steps The ordinance requires a free permit; banding or another identification method for birds to support enforcement; a requirement that coops and pens be maintained so as not to create a public nuisance; and a one-year sunset to allow the council to reassess citywide effects. Animal-control staff said they have limited evening coverage (officers through 8 p.m. weekdays, shorter weekend hours) and described typical steps for complaint response: inspect, notify owner, allow time to remedy, and escalate to seizure only if necessary.

Why it matters The vote changes municipal policy on animal-keeping in residential neighborhoods and creates a regulatory pathway for residents to keep small numbers of hens. The one-year sunset gives the council a formal review point; enforcement will be complaint-driven and rely on coordination between the clerk—s permit process and animal-control inspections.

Speakers quoted are listed in the meeting record and attributed to the council hearing.