Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves higher-density redevelopment of 700 W. I‑65 Service Road; application seeks 240 apartments
Summary
The Board of Adjustment approved a variance allowing higher-density redevelopment of the former Ramada Inn parcels at 700 West I‑65 Service Road, enabling the applicant to pursue approximately 240 apartment units across the site.
Get email alerts on the Housing Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Adjustment approved a density variance to allow a multifamily redevelopment of parcels at 700 West I‑65 Service Road, enabling the developer to pursue roughly 240 apartment units across the former Ramada Inn site. Attorney Jay Watkins representing the applicant said the three-lot site in the airport quadrant currently contains motel buildings with doors opening onto parking lots; the redevelopment envisions demolition and replacement with new multifamily buildings, a pool, fitness area and resident amenities. The applicant requested an increase from the underlying B-3 density limit (25 units per acre) to about 38 units per acre, which would yield roughly 240 units across the site. Why it matters: The proposed redevelopment converts blighted or obsolete motel properties into higher-density multifamily housing in a city-designated priority investment area. The board’s decision clears the way for the applicant to seek a major PUD modification at the Planning Commission and to proceed with more detailed site and engineering work. Board process and next steps: The applicant noted the project will return to the Planning Commission for PUD modification (meeting scheduled Aug. 21) and will need engineering review for stormwater, grading and parking. Board members asked about building height and site design; applicant said the project may request a modest height variance for a peaked roof in lieu of a flat roof. The board approved the density variance subject to staff conditions 1 and 2 and findings of fact. Additional considerations: The board and staff discussed inclusion of open space and play areas; a board member recommended adding child‑oriented open space even if not required by code. The developer’s representatives will prepare site plans and renderings for subsequent hearings and administrative review.

