Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects Menace Road topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee tables request for Menace Road fire facility clearing and paving, citing cost and lack of departmental request
Summary
A committee recommendation to fund clearing, leveling, and paving behind the Menace Road fire facility (estimated originally at $150,000, with staff suggesting a partial $75,000) was tabled after debate about whether the fire department requested the work and concerns about using funds for the project.
The County Finance Committee on Aug. 4 voted to table a request to fund clearing, leveling and paving behind the Menace Road fire facility after members debated the project's necessity and who had requested it.
Background and request: the building and land committee had asked finance to identify funding for site work behind a new fire building on Menace Road. The initial estimate for the full project was about $150,000; the mayor said the building and land committee later narrowed the requested scope roughly in half and estimated funding of up to $75,000 would cover removal of the bank behind the current project footprint (roughly 200 feet by 30 feet).
Committee discussion: several commissioners stressed that the fire department and Chief Stewart had not asked for the full work and that the mayor and chief did not consider the $150,000 request essential. Commissioner Offord said the request originated with the committee rather than department leadership and suggested tabling. Commissioners also discussed future access to the rear parcel if work were delayed and the potential for higher costs later if work had to be done around completed pads and drives.
Motion and vote: Commissioner Offord moved to table the request; Commissioner Collins seconded. The motion passed at the committee level with three votes in favor, one opposed (Commissioner Edmondson), and one absence. Committee members observed that tabling would require a future vote to take the item off the table and then another vote to approve any funding.
Why it matters: tabling removes the immediate funding direction; the mayor asked that staff pull the item for the full commission agenda so the full commission could provide final direction and avoid holding up two related construction projects while finance decides.
Next steps: staff were asked to include the item on the full commission agenda; if the full commission approves funding tonight (the mayor's phrasing), staff will proceed with the two projects; if not, work will remain on hold.
