Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Restitution topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court finds no restitution in State v. Anthony Villareal (2024CR4216)
Summary
At a restitution hearing date, the 187th District Court found there was no restitution to award in the case against Anthony Villareal and excused the defendant after noting the state had not located the victim for an amount calculation.
Judge Stephanie Boyd told the court she would find that “there is to be no restitution” in cause number 2024CR4216, State v. Anthony Villareal, after the prosecutor and defense told the court the victim could not be contacted and no restitution amount had been established.
Prosecutor Jason Gerahan announced the case and advised the court that the state had not been able to reach the victim and therefore had no documented restitution amount to present. Defense counsel Charles Gold confirmed his client’s appearance and advised the court there was no contest to the court concluding no restitution at this time.
The court entered an order on the record that no restitution would be imposed in the matter recorded as 2024CR4216, and the defendant was excused. The matter remains on the docket in case subsequent restitution information is developed, but no immediate monetary obligation was ordered by the court at that appearance.
