Board reviews conflict-of-interest policy language; members ask for clearer honorarium and discipline provisions

During a first reading on July 31 the North Hills Board of Education reviewed a proposed conflict-of-interest policy (8.27) that the Pennsylvania School Boards Association recommended. Board members asked for clearer language about a provision stating that “no board member or district employees shall accept an honorarium” and requested a separate explanation of disciplinary consequences that would apply differently to employees and to elected board members.

Sandy Cozera (board member) flagged the honorarium line as “a little vague” and said she was unsure whether the term required additional definition or could be removed. Other board members noted the policy largely codifies state law and recommended clarifying examples or a procedure for reporting potential violations.

On disciplinary language, a board member asked that employee disciplinary consequences be listed distinctly from the remedies applicable to board members, noting limits on how the board may discipline an elected official. The discussion concluded with a suggestion to add a line clarifying that disciplinary remedies for board members are governed by applicable law.

The board approved first readings of several related policies recommended by PSBA (including federal fiscal compliance and a travel-reimbursement policy for federal programs). The board agreed to table one policy item (identified in the meeting as item 6 under policy) for further revision so that the honorarium and disciplinary provisions can be clarified before a second reading.