Council discusses $1.9 million milling and resurfacing bid; two-contractor approach adopted

5522103 · July 31, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public Works reported July 21 that Wiregrass Construction was the lowest responsive bidder at $1,895,250 for the town’s milling and resurfacing contract and recommended a primary/secondary contractor arrangement with Vulcan Materials as the backup.

Public Works reported July 21 on the results of the town’s repaving bid and recommended awarding the milling and resurfacing work to a primary contractor with a secondary contractor as backup.

Staff said Wiregrass Construction was the lowest responsive bidder at $1,895,250 and Vulcan Materials was the next lowest at $1,957,500. The town is proposing a primary/secondary contractor arrangement so that Wiregrass would be awarded 100% of the work; if Wiregrass cannot perform a portion or all of the work, the second-lowest bidder (Vulcan) would pick up that work under the contract’s substitution clause.

Contract structure and scope: staff said the contract is for one year with two optional one-year extensions (total possible three years). The bid was quantity-based (tonnage) rather than listing a specific roadway list, although the town provided a list of target roadways to councilmembers for planning and noted that the project will install permissive-left arrow signal backplates and signal-related improvements at about 10–13 intersections.

Why it matters: the contract covers major resurfacing across the town and includes multiple road and signal upgrades. The multi-year option and the backup bidder approach are intended to stabilize pricing and ensure performance if the primary contractor cannot complete all work.

Discussion and clarifications: - Bidding approach: council asked whether the bids were based on roadway lists or quantities; staff confirmed this bid was quantity-based (tonnage). Councilmembers noted the provided roadway list and asked clarifying questions about intersections that will receive permissive-left arrows and reflective signal backplates. - Timeline and contract terms: staff reiterated the one-year base contract with two optional one-year extensions; the substitution to the second bidder follows Section 3(a) of the bid documents.

Decision and next steps: staff said the item will be placed on the consent agenda for the council meeting. The workshop transcript records presentation and Q&A but does not show a formal award vote.

Clarifying details: Wiregrass was the lowest responsive bidder at $1,895,250; Vulcan was second at $1,957,500. Staff said the bid emphasized tonnage (quantity) and that about 10 intersections will receive permissive-left arrow work and about 13 intersections will receive signal backplates.