Routt County staff told commissioners that dispatch‑funding notices issued last week have prompted substantial feedback from partner fire districts, with smaller districts warning of unintended consequences for existing intergovernmental agreements (IGAs) and near‑term budget shortfalls.

Staff highlighted West Routt Fire Protection District and Oak Creek as examples: West Routt is operating on a roughly $1 million annual budget and faces a multi‑year lag between growth and valuation increases; staff said the district is using improvised approaches for equipment procurement. Commissioners said the dispatch funding proposal could affect cost‑sharing IGAs and rental rates the county pays for communication tower sites.

Options discussed included phasing in indirect or direct cost components, creating an oversight board to manage distribution and reviewing in‑kind contributions from partners to offset charges. Staff said they had eliminated a previous communications board due to low participation but would consider a new oversight structure if a funding mechanism leads to higher participation.

Commissioners planned a joint meeting with city staff in early August and anticipated letters and further outreach from municipalities and districts. No final policy was adopted at the work session; staff will continue engagement and return with proposals that could include phased implementation and an oversight board.

Why it matters: Dispatch funding affects public safety budgets and regional emergency response relationships; changes to how costs are allocated could strain small districts with limited budgets or change longstanding mutual‑aid arrangements.