Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Residents press Hiram to finish Seaboard Township streets after county accepted developer's bond

July 31, 2025 | Hiram City , Paulding County, Georgia


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Residents press Hiram to finish Seaboard Township streets after county accepted developer's bond
Garnet Morris, a member of the Seaboard Township board, urged the Hiram City Council to use city funds to finish street paving and other incomplete work in Seaboard Township Phase 2, saying residents have lived with the deficiencies for about five years.
Cliff (staff) said the city solicited two bids and selected HNC as the qualifying contractor for the topping, curb and gutter, and other repairs at a price of $82,670. Paulding County previously accepted a developer performance bond of $72,625, leaving the city's estimated shortfall at about $9,000–$10,000 before contingencies. Cliff said the selection of HNC reflected staff checks of references and pricing; an alternative bidder, J1 Power, had an unexplained omission related to curbing and therefore was not chosen.
Staff reviewed an inspection report from Paulding County (inspection dates 01/22/2021 and 02/08/2022) that lists 13 deficiencies, including sidewalk replacement, topping replacement, binder deficiencies, curb and sidewalk repair, catch basin and storm structure work, and coordination with Paulding County DOT for drainage and signage. Council members noted homeowner complaints of flooding and damaged lawns and cited multiple unaddressed deficiencies.
City Attorney cautioned that intergovernmental immunities and precedent could limit the city's ability to recover money from the county or developer if the city pays the shortfall. He summarized a Court of Appeals decision addressing whether one government could recover funds from another for deficient service delivery and said state immunities would factor into any litigation.
Council reaction was split. Some members argued for immediate action to help residents and to proceed with the HNC contract so repairs could start; others asked staff and the attorney to explore legal recourse and options with Paulding County and the developer before the city expended funds. No binding vote to award or fund the work was recorded at the work session; staff indicated they will return with options, and some council members asked that the item be considered at the next regular meeting or sooner for a vote.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Georgia articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI