The Special Legislative Commission on Emerging Firearm Technology voted at its July 20 meeting to accept its final report and to submit it to the clerk for transmission to the Massachusetts General Court, concluding the commission’s statutory charge.

At the start of the meeting the co-chairs said they received a dissenting policy brief from Commissioner Peter Durant and Representative Donald Bertheum at approximately 7:40–7:43 a.m. on the day of the meeting; by mutual agreement of the co-chairs the dissenting brief will be included as an appendix to the commission’s report. The co-chairs also directed that a June 23 report submitted by Commissioner Lazard entitled "United States Courts and their problem with unintentional firearm micro stamps" be included as an appendix.

The transcript records a roll-call vote to accept and submit the final report. The commission reported the motion passed; the transcript records 8 in favor and 3 opposed. The number of abstentions is not specified clearly in the transcript (the roll call language is inconsistent on the number of abstentions), but the motion was recorded as passing and the report was submitted to the clerk's office.

Why it matters: Acceptance of the report makes the commission’s recommendations — on microstamping, personalized firearms incentives, and other findings — part of the formal record delivered to the General Court for legislative consideration.

What comes next: The clerk will receive the report for transmission to the General Court; any statutory changes, funding or regulatory work recommended by the commission would require separate action by the legislature and executive branch agencies.