Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grading Credit Recovery topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances grading and credit-recovery changes: numeric credit-recovery grades, averaging rule, cap at 70
Summary
Committee members reviewed proposed updates to grading and credit-recovery rules that change credit recovery from a pass/fail approach for core courses to a numeric averaging model and cap recovery averages at 70.
The Robertson County policy committee reviewed proposed changes to grading and credit-recovery rules that staff said reflect State Board policy changes.
District staff reported that the State Board changed how credit recovery is calculated. Under the draft policy language presented to the committee, credit recovery for core courses will no longer operate as a simple pass/fail; instead, the district will compute a numeric grade by averaging the student’s original course grade and the credit-recovery grade. Staff said the district will assign a numeric grade for credit recovery and that, after averaging, the numerical grade earned through credit recovery may not exceed 70.
Staff also described participation thresholds and a minimum cutoff. As Dr. Carr said in committee discussion: “there is a cutoff criteria of who will need to take the whole course back over again based on their score and who can participate in credit recovery. So not everybody that fails a class could automatically be part of credit recovery. They have to have a certain score. So if they have anything lower than a 40, they'll actually have to retake the entire course.”
Additional context - Policy 3400 was presented with clarified language about grading for kindergarten through second grade and updates for third through 12th grades; policy 3420 (credit recovery) was described as revised to reflect the State Board changes. - The district’s grading floor (minimum assignable grade) remains 50 percent by existing district policy; administrators confirmed that the 50 percent floor continues to apply when reporting final grades. - Staff said the administration and high school principals met to develop criteria for which students qualify for credit recovery and how numeric grades will be calculated; the committee packet included those principal-level conversations for review.
Process and next steps - The committee voted to forward the spring policy packet, including the grading and credit-recovery revisions, to the full board. Administrators said they will communicate details and implementation guidance to principals and include operational criteria in the packet sent to the board.
Speakers quoted or cited in this article are those who spoke during the committee discussion; direct quotes come from meeting remarks.
