Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety Equipment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Police present $1.6M FY21 fleet need; lead time and repair costs complicate replacement plan

5513953 · July 31, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Police logistics and operations staff told the commission the department needs about $1.6 million for FY21 vehicle replacements and additions (19 replacements, 10 additions, one community-service vehicle) and warned a 12–14 month procurement lead time requires budgeting well in advance.

Captain Andrew Clark and Sergeant Ray Shaw presented the police department’s vehicle needs on July 19, laying out a roughly $1.6 million estimate for FY21 to replace 19 vehicles and add 10 more, plus a community service aide vehicle or an interim conversion. Clark and Shaw said the department maintains about 372 vehicles (173 marked, 117 unmarked, 82 specialty) and that the collective-bargaining replacement standard for marked patrol cars is either eight years or 140,000 miles. They reported multiple total-loss vehicles in FY21 and noted risk-management recoveries for wrecked vehicles recover only a fraction of replacement cost. Clark said much of the FY21 replacement need stems from vehicles meeting the contract thresholds or being total losses; he listed 15 contract-mandated replacements and additional needs tied to grant-funded positions that will eventually return to the general fund. The department provided per-unit cost estimates. Full build-out of a new marked patrol vehicle (including dealer options, emergency equipment and a full police electronics package) runs in the roughly $52,000–$57,000 range depending on whether equipment can be reused. Clark warned that "It takes approximately 12 to 14 months from the time you submit a purchase order to the time a vehicle goes into service," and that long lead times make multi-year planning necessary. Sergeant Shaw described a short-term option to convert an existing vehicle for community-service use at about $2,000, noting the conversion would be a temporary remedy because aging vehicles have higher maintenance costs. Commissioners asked about insurance reimbursement levels, the life-cycle benefits of take-home assignments versus hot-seated cars, and whether hybrids or electric vehicles had been considered. Staff said take-home assignments generally extend vehicle life, that hybrid/EV options remain more expensive to purchase and repair (staff cited high battery-replacement costs), and that insurance recoveries are structured around standard market (blue-book) values; staff said they would research premium/coverage alternatives. No formal funding decision was recorded July 19; staff flagged that FY22 will include additional vehicle and specialty-vehicle needs (and a preliminary FY22 vehicle estimate near $2.4 million was noted) and recommended the commission consider multi-year budgeting to avoid future fleet replacement spikes.