Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Plaistow board to negotiate with consultant to update public safety impact fee methodology

July 16, 2025 | Plaistow Board of Selectmen, Plaistow, Rockingham County, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Plaistow board to negotiate with consultant to update public safety impact fee methodology
The Plaistow Planning Board on July 16 voted 4‑0 to enter contract negotiations with the consultant identified in the board’s RFP response (referenced in the record with variant spellings) to update the town’s public safety impact fee methodology. The board approved moving forward within the budget available to the planning board and directed staff to negotiate contract terms.

Why it matters: the town has not updated its public safety impact fee methodology in several years; the board and selectmen discussed budget constraints and determined that an update to the public safety fee would provide the most value for available funds. The update will determine the fee charged on net new building area and could affect future development cost allocations for fire and police services.

The board reviewed two proposals in response to its RFP. One firm identified in the record as “Puigere/Fugere/Fujair Planning and Development” of Milford, N.H., proposed a scoped cost for the public safety update of $15,000; an alternative submittal from DTA of Raleigh, N.C., listed a higher a la carte rate (~$28,800) that exceeded the planning board’s available funds. With approximately $20,000 available for impact‑fee work, members and the selectmen’s representative concluded that commissioning the public safety update represented the best use of current funds. A motion to enter contract negotiations with the top‑ranked consultant for the public safety impact fee update carried 4‑0.

The board discussed that the selected consultant has local experience and previously worked with the town; staff will work with the consultant to finalize scope, deliverables and meeting costs and will report back to the board. The board noted remaining funds would be modest and asked the consultant to identify any extra meeting or scope costs (the proposals included per‑meeting costs should out‑of‑scope work be needed). The board authorized staff to negotiate a contract and return with the agreement for formal execution.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI