Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation Facilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates next steps for athletic‑field replacement after $20,000 survey; no vote taken
Summary
Councilors heard that survey work at the Little League Complex is underway and that the next phase — engineering and an opinion of probable cost — would cost about $50,000; members were divided on whether to spend additional town funds given a failed March warrant article and the town’s budget constraints.
At the June 11 meeting the Bedford Town Council discussed next steps for municipal athletic‑field improvements after the council previously authorized topographic survey work. Public Works Director Jeff Foote reported the field survey work at the Little League Complex is complete and that work on the Swenson Road portion was scheduled to follow; consultant Hoyle Tanner is performing the field surveys with an expected partial completion date around August 1.
Foote said the town had authorized about $19,600 for design services and roughly $1,900 for an opinion of probable cost for the Little League Complex, with an additional $26,400 for Swenson design and $2,300 for an opinion of cost for that site. Councilors and staff confirmed the survey contract sums: about $7,700 for the Little League survey and $12,400 for Swenson (just under $20,000 total to date).
Councilors debated whether to spend roughly $50,000 more for engineering and a formal opinion of cost now — giving the town firm numbers to present to voters — or to delay further design work because a March warrant article to fund the field project was defeated and the town recently operated under a default budget. Councilor Bill Carter said, “I’m still a no. We don't have authorization from voters to do any, spend any money really for this.” Other councilors urged getting a firm cost estimate so the council could present a complete plan if it returned a project to the ballot.
Several councilors called for individual site visits to the Nashua Road and Swenson Road fields before the next meeting and suggested stakeholders and the public be engaged; one councilor suggested informal outreach to better understand community sentiment before spending more funds. Councilors also discussed design‑bid‑build versus design‑build procurement methods; staff recommended a design‑bid‑build approach based on recent successful town work at Sportsman’s Field.
No formal council vote was taken on additional funding at the June 11 meeting. Staff said the next milestone is completion of the survey and returning cost opinions and designs to the council so members can decide whether to place a project on a future warrant.
