Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board OKs 2025–26 school bus contractor and spare-bus agreements
Summary
The Saint Mary's County Board of Education approved regular-route and spare-bus contractor agreements for the 2025–26 school year, covering 164 regular-route buses, 29 special-needs buses and 48 spare buses; payment rates and retention incentives were described by staff.
Get email alerts on the School Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On July 30 the Saint Mary's County Board of Education approved contracts with school bus contractors for the 2025–26 school year, including regular-route and spare-bus agreements. The board’s motion to approve the agreements passed after a brief staff presentation and no substantive public or board debate. The contracts cover 41 school bus contractors operating 164 regular-route school buses, 29 special-needs route buses and 48 spare buses; the procurement also includes 12 replacement school buses and 21 six-year contract renewals, staff said. Staff described the payment formula used in the contract, including a per-vehicle allotment that uses the prime rate (recently reported at 8%), and noted bus prices rose about 5 percent. Hourly payments in the formula include a driver base rate of $30.10 (which incorporates a 26.5% fixed-cost component), a tenant rate of $24.47 (also with the 26.5% fixed-cost component), and a maintenance rate increase of $0.03 per mile. The formula also includes a $5,000 annual retention payment per bus and an operations payment increase of $140 per bus; stipend payments were unchanged. Board members moved and seconded the contract approval and the chair called the question; the motion carried. Staff recommended the board approve both regular contractor agreements and spare-bus agreements as presented. The superintendent’s office noted staff will monitor future cost pressures, including potential Environmental Protection Agency electric-vehicle mandates and possible steel tariffs, and bring information forward as needed. The board did not discuss changes to routes or student-ride assignments at this meeting; those operational matters were not part of the purchasing approval.

