Council committee issues adverse report on proposal to convert smoke shop into vape shop

5504344 · July 29, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The planning committee recommended an adverse report and council approved it 11-2, blocking a conditional-use request that would have allowed a local business to sell more than 25% vape products and operate as a vape shop.

Akron City Council’s planning committee issued an adverse report on a conditional-use request to convert an existing smoke shop into a vape shop; the council approved the adverse report in a roll-call vote, 11–2.

Councilman DeShazier (spelled in transcript as DeShazier) explained that the business is already operating as a smoke shop and that Ohio law permits a ‘‘grandfathered’’ smoke shop to sell up to 25% vape products. He said the applicant sought permission to exceed that 25% threshold, which would make it a vape shop and change the nature of the use in the neighborhood. DeShazier said neighbors raised residential and commercial concerns during the June 9 conditional-use public hearing, and the committee recommended disapproval.

During the roll call, the adverse report passed 11–2; the council then filed the ordinance. The transcript does not show a subsequent local permit issuance or other council action to overturn the committee’s recommendation.

Why it matters: The vote preserves the current statutory/permits-based distinction between smoke shops and vape shops as applied by council policy and reflects neighborhood opposition to expanding a store’s permitted vape-sales activity.

What the council decided: The committee’s adverse report was approved on the floor (11–2) and the ordinance will be filed; no further action on permitting was recorded at this meeting.

Ending: The planning committee’s recommendation to disapprove a conditional use will be filed and the business’s request to exceed the 25% vape-sales threshold is effectively blocked unless reconsidered in a future proceeding.