Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Violations Fine topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board imposes $100‑per‑day fine on property owner who fails to clear driveway storage

5502478 · July 30, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Code Enforcement Board voted to impose a $100 per day fine, capped at $10,000, against Kenneth Bueno (205 Fremont Ave.) for continued driveway storage and related violations after repeated notices and limited progress.

The Code Enforcement Board voted April 10 to impose a fine of $100 per day, up to $10,000, on the owner of 205 Fremont Avenue for continuing violations including outdoor storage and items on the driveway.

Why it matters: Daily fines can become liens on property and are intended to motivate owners to correct violations that affect neighborhood appearance and safety.

Inspector Ron Beaney told the board the respondent was first notified on Sept. 4, 2024, and that staff had seen some progress (painting of the house and fence work) but violations remained. The inspector recommended a $100‑per‑day fine with a $10,000 cap because staff considered the case complaint‑driven and unresolved.

Kenneth Bueno told the board he was working to consolidate and load items into a shipping container but cited delays in arranging container pickup and finances; he asked for more time. Board members indicated this matter had been pending since September and that they needed a firm compliance date.

Board actions: Ms. Marsh moved and Ms. Himes seconded a motion to impose the fine effective that day, continuing until compliance or the $10,000 cap was reached. The motion carried; the chair explained to Bueno that the fine would become a lien on the property if not paid and that he could return later for a lien review if the property was brought into compliance.

Ending: The owner was directed to coordinate completion with Inspector Beaney and was reminded that staff can verify compliance only after notification and re‑inspection.