Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hotel Motel Compliance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
New management at 1800 S. Atlantic reports clean‑up; magistrate records compliance but warns of willful fines for repeat violations
Summary
The Special Magistrate found Whirlwind Daytona Investment 1 LLC in compliance on exterior storage and rubbish but ordered a July progress report on building violations and barred Unit 119 from occupancy until it is fully repaired.
Get email alerts on the Hotel Motel Compliance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Whirlwind Daytona Investment 1 LLC told the Special Magistrate it has replaced management, improved property operations and cooperated with police; the magistrate found the property in compliance for an exterior storage and rubbish case but deferred remaining building‑related violations and an after‑the‑fact permit matter for further progress review. The court placed special restrictions on one unit and warned that future, repeated violations could lead to willful fines.
Why it matters: The property at 1800 South Atlantic was tied in testimony to criminal activity, a police search warrant and longstanding neighborhood complaints about trash, illegal dumping and unsecured units. The magistrate’s finding of compliance on one matter did not resolve building and interior violations the city continues to pursue.
Newly appointed on‑site manager and owner representatives told the magistrate they had improved internal screening, upgraded camera monitoring and were cooperating with Daytona Beach Police Department. Neighbors and a community representative described visible and sustained problems after new ownership in 2024, including trash, mattresses and toilets left on site and arrests in April 2025.
On one matter the magistrate found the respondent had come into compliance but imposed a willful‑violation warning: future occurrences will bring a willful fine hearing and fines “up to $5,000 per occurrence.” On a separate case addressing building issues, the magistrate found most violations could be corrected by July 2, 2025, but ordered that Unit 119 not be rented, occupied or used until it is fully compliant; the magistrate scheduled a progress report on Unit 119 for the July 8 meeting and allowed additional time for the unit’s architect and permit process.
Ending: The magistrate emphasized continued cooperation with police and code inspectors and required progress reporting in July. The property owners were advised to use city resources, including the police Trespass Arrest Initiative, to address trespass and crime‑related problems that are distinct from code violations but affect compliance outcomes.

