Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears proposal to limit electricity-price risk and pursue solar, EV infrastructure
Summary
Administrators and an energy consultant told the board the district’s electricity contract expires next June and recommended a procurement approach that passes through capacity charges while fixing other supply components; the board was also briefed on solar and EV grant funding under consideration.
District staff and an outside energy consultant advised the Board of Education that the district’s electricity and natural-gas contracts expire in mid-2026 and outlined choices for renewal to limit exposure to sharply higher capacity costs. The board heard a recommendation to fix energy components except for capacity and transmission — a structure that would pass capacity charges through at market prices while fixing the other elements of supply. Seth Crackle, an energy consultant from NANIA, told the board the district’s current all-in electricity supply rate is about 5.7¢ per kilowatt-hour and that the market’s capacity component has recently spiked, pushing renewal offers materially higher than the district’s current locked price. “One of the other components of electricity supply… went up almost 10x what it had been the last several years,” Crackle said, referring to the capacity charge that grid operators use to pay for reserve resources. Crackle recommended a contract that fixes energy, losses and ancillary components but passes capacity and transmission through at market cost to avoid a premium that suppliers may add to a fully fixed product given the recent capacity volatility. The district’s electricity usage is roughly 12 million kilowatt-hours per year; administrators said demand-response participation and energy-efficiency steps can reduce capacity exposure by lowering peak loads. On natural gas, renewal quotes were close to current levels and less volatile than electricity, Crackle said, making a conventional fixed forward purchase a reasonable option for gas supply. Administrators also briefed the board on capital projects tied to energy reduction: LED stadium lighting, field-house flooring, and EV-charging and solar projects supported by a recent grant program. The administration said a $300,000 categorical grant will offset LED stadium work, and it is awaiting formal notice on an additional $500,000 solar grant before including it in Fund 90 capital accounting. “What’s not in there is the additional grant of $500,000 for our solar, which will be here in the t 99. We're waiting to see until we get more official word,” a staff member said. Because market conditions change quickly, staff asked the board for authority to lock energy contracts when market timing is favorable and asked for flexibility to consider contract terms up to 48 months. The board did not take a binding vote on procurement at the meeting; staff said they will return with firm recommendations for approval.
