Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Docket Administrative Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court grants attorney withdrawals, removes case from docket and processes name-change steps
Summary
During the docket call the court granted motions to withdraw for counsel, removed a case from the docket, and conducted preliminary steps in a name-change petition, asking the petitioner to sign and obtain certified copies.
The court granted attorney withdrawal motions and removed a case from the docket, and it conducted routine steps in a name-change petition during the docket call.
When the court asked about a motion to withdraw filed by Jennifer Honeycutt, the judge solicited opposition and, receiving none, stated, “Any motion withdrawal granted.” The judge also granted a separate motion filed by Miss Smith regarding an Adelado veil matter after the parties indicated it should be taken off the docket.
In another matter the judge told the petitioner seeking a name change that he is required by law to ask certain questions. The petitioner answered “No” when asked whether the name change was to avoid debts or criminal prosecution. The judge then instructed the petitioner to sign the order reflecting the new name and advised that a certified copy could be obtained from the clerk's office.
The court also discussed a case captioned Ashila/Ashley Bello and instructed that the case be dismissed or removed from the docket. The judge concluded the docket call after addressing these routine administrative requests.
Less-critical details: the transcript referenced case captions including Jessica Lehi Cox v. Terry Edward Cox and Mark Ward Moore v. Christy Diane Moore elsewhere on the docket, but the court's actions in this segment were limited to withdrawals, a docket removal, and processing of the name-change petition.
