Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Case Continuance Counsel Request topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court continues Mayo v. Hailey; both sides told to seek counsel, hearing reset to Oct. 27
Summary
The court granted a continuance in Douglas Mayo Jr. v. Janice R. Hailey after the plaintiff reported a medical issue and both sides asked for time to obtain counsel; the matter was reset to Oct. 27.
The court continued the case Douglas Mayo Jr. v. Janice R. Hailey to Oct. 27 after both parties indicated they needed additional time to obtain counsel and the plaintiff reported a medical problem.
Counsel reported that the case had been set for July 3 but was later reset; the attorney representing Mayo said Mayo became ill and could not appear. The attorney told the court he texted with his client and that Mayo "is sick and can't" attend. Both sides asked for a continuance to retain counsel, and the court reset the matter to Oct. 27.
The judge asked that the matter be assigned for Oct. 27 and noted time estimates: one attorney estimated his proof would take about 30 minutes and suggested a maximum of three hours if needed. The court emphasized assignment to the Oct. 27 docket so counsel could plan accordingly.
Less-critical details: the judge noted the July 3 order had not been entered on the record and stated he would submit one for the file to “clean up the record.”
