Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ordinance Codification topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Maitland council adopts updated codification of city ordinances

5496301 · July 29, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On second reading July 28, 2025, the Maitland City Council adopted Ordinance 1441, a citywide codification and republication of the city's permanent ordinances required by statute and regularly updated, with no public comment and unanimous council approval.

The Maitland City Council on July 28, 2025, approved Ordinance 1441 on second reading to adopt a new general codification and publication of the city’s permanent ordinances. The measure was approved after staff described the required decennial update and there were no public speakers.

The ordinance compiles ordinances the council has adopted over time, repeals ordinances not included in the new code and provides penalties for violations, according to the reading of the ordinance at the meeting. City Manager Mark (introduced the item) said the update is required every 10 years to reflect statutory changes and to incorporate ordinances not previously codified.

Council opened and closed public comment with no speakers. A council member moved to approve Ordinance 1441 on second reading and the motion passed on a roll call vote. The council did not request further changes at the July 28 meeting.

By adopting the codification, the council directed staff to proceed with publication and to continue using the updated code and supplements in future updates. The ordinance text states the publication will be supplemented and revised from time to time; the council did not set an effective date in the meeting record.

The adoption completes the statutory codification step described by staff and removes ordinances the city determined should be repealed in the new publication. The council did not receive any public comment on the ordinance during the meeting.

The council proceeded to other agenda items after the vote.