Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rental 1 The Downs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Zoning board denies short‑term rental request at 1 The Downs after neighborhood safety concerns
Summary
The Tuscaloosa Zoning Board of Adjustments denied Dorothy Reed’s request for a special exception to operate a short‑term rental at 1 The Downs, citing neighborhood opposition focused on parking, traffic visibility and emergency access.
The City of Tuscaloosa Zoning Board of Adjustments voted to deny a petitioner’s request on July 28 to operate a short‑term rental at 1 The Downs in the historic Downs neighborhood.
The board’s decision followed a staff presentation and public comment in which neighbors raised concerns about limited visibility exiting the neighborhood onto Hargrove Avenue, game‑day traffic, street parking and potential impacts on emergency vehicle access.
Dorothy Reed, the petitioner, described the house as “our home” and said she and her family plan to use it as a base while their daughter attends the University of Alabama. Reed said she would equip the property with cameras, keypad locks and a noise detection system and would retain a local property manager if the board approved the request.
Residents who spoke in opposition cited safety and parking problems at the Downs entrance. Charter Morris, a next‑door neighbor, said limited sight lines and prior collisions at the neighborhood entrance prompted worry that additional short‑term guests could increase risks. “I am very worried for [my son’s] ability to exit the neighborhood and reenter the neighborhood both by foot and by car,” Morris said.
Dr. Eric Lake, a University of Alabama professor, said he and other residents rely on the neighborhood’s rules and proximity to campus for daily routines and urged the board to protect that character. Councilwoman Raven Howard of District 2 spoke in support of the neighborhood’s request to slow action so residents and the petitioner could further discuss concerns.
Staff noted 16 written comments in opposition and recommended a lower occupancy than requested if the board were to approve. The petitioner asked for up to 8 adults and 4 vehicles; staff recommended 8 adults and 4 vehicles based on parking, while some board members suggested more restrictive limits for a probationary year.
After board discussion, the petition failed. The board did not announce a recorded roll‑call of votes in the meeting transcript excerpt provided; the chair stated only that the petition fails.
The Zoning Board’s authority to grant special exceptions derives from state law and the city’s zoning ordinance; appeals of board decisions may be filed to the circuit court within 15 days, as the board noted at the meeting.
