Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Signage Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Variance request to allow signage exceeding 6 continued after July 28 meeting
Summary
Members at an unspecified July 28, 2045 meeting deferred consideration of Mission 25-31, a variance petition by Michael Cruz of Crown Point Owner LLC seeking permission to allow signage to exceed 6 (unit not specified) at 12701; the item was continued to a future meeting after members moved to defer.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Signage Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a July 28, 2045 meeting, members deferred consideration of Mission 25-31, a variance petition by Michael Cruz of Crown Point Owner LLC seeking permission to allow signage to exceed 6 (unit not specified) at 12701.
The item drew brief discussion before a motion to defer. A meeting presenter indicated that no parties were present to discuss the petition, saying, "This means we do not have people here." The petitioner is listed on the agenda as Michael Cruz; the transcript identifies him as the petitioner and references Crown Point Owner LLC in relation to the property.
The agenda item was introduced as Mission 25-31 and described as a "variance from [a] development standard" with the stated purpose to "allow signage to exceed 6." The presenter also noted the item location as "12701." The transcript does not specify the unit associated with the number 6 (for example: six signs, six feet, six square feet) and does not record technical or ordinance language clarifying the measurement.
John Marshall moved to defer the item; the motion was seconded by Mr. Rohaley. The meeting had four members present out of five; the transcript records affirmative responses following the motion. The transcript does not include a roll-call vote or a recorded vote tally by name; the record notes that four of five members were present when the motion was made and contains multiple affirmative verbal responses following the motion. The item was continued to a future meeting.
No ordinance, statute, or development code citation appears in the transcript related to the variance request, and no public comment or additional materials were entered on the record during this item.
The meeting returned to miscellaneous business after the deferral; the transcript does not show further substantive action on Mission 25-31 at that session.

