Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Commission staff recommend Ferris Engineering for courthouse MEP and structural site assessment

July 23, 2025 | Miami County, Kansas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission staff recommend Ferris Engineering for courthouse MEP and structural site assessment
Miami County commissioners at a July 23 study session heard staff recommend awarding RFP 2511 — the mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) and structural site assessment for the Miami County Courthouse — to Ferris Engineering, citing a price-weighted evaluation of proposals.
Project manager Matt Oler told commissioners that six proposals were received and that the county narrowed the list to three finalists: Bartlett & West, BG Consultants and Ferris Engineering. "It is staff's recommendation that we execute a contract with Ferris engineering to conduct the MEP and the structural assessment," Oler said, adding that Bartlett & West produced the most comprehensive written proposal but Ferris’s lower price and acceptable approach made it the recommended award under a price-weighted scoring method.
The Ferris proposal quoted $26,800 for its work; Bartlett & West submitted $35,180. Under Ferris’s approach, Ferris would perform the MEP work while PMA Engineering would do the structural site assessment and Construction Management Resources would prepare cost estimates. Oler described the procurement as a complementary study aligned with the commission’s earlier needs study for the courthouse.
Commissioners and staff discussed the implications of prime firms performing more work in-house versus using subcontractors. Commissioner Shane (first name not specified in the record) said outsourcing structural work to a specialist is common and expressed no objection to Ferris’s use of subconsultants. Commissioners also asked about the likelihood of change orders on a study contract; Oler said he did not anticipate significant change orders on a study and that Ferris’s proposal indicated the firm would generally not expect the county to cover items not listed in the bid, providing some price certainty.
No formal motion or vote on award was recorded in the study-session transcript; the item concluded with commissioners discussing next steps and moving to the environmental assessment agenda item.
The commission may next schedule contract execution or additional review before a formal award action on the consent or regular agenda.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Kansas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI