This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Pam Brown and Diane Blasato French addressed the Merrimack County Board of Commissioners during public comment, urging the board to investigate what they described as widespread constitutional nonconformance and alleged deprivation of rights by state actors. Brown said the dispute has been submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court and invoked Article III. She cited federal criminal statutes (Title 18, sections 241 and 242) that criminalize deprivation of civil rights under color of law and argued that millions of citizens are affected.
Why it matters: The speakers asked the county to direct local law-enforcement leaders to “do their job” and to investigate alleged unlawful conduct; the board noted limits on its authority regarding independently elected officials such as the sheriff. The board accepted a written copy of the letter and granted a time extension for public comment on a motion.
What happened at the meeting: Brown read at length from a prepared letter outlining constitutional arguments and claimed hundreds of thousands of affected people; commissioners interrupted with procedural questions and asked whether the speakers had pursued federal law-enforcement avenues such as the FBI. A commissioner noted that the sheriff is an independently elected official and said the commission cannot direct the sheriff on how to execute duties. The board debated whether to allow additional speaking time; Commissioner Loveland moved to waive the four‑minute rule and grant three additional minutes, the motion was seconded and the extra time was provided. The board accepted a signed copy of the letter for its records and staff offered to review the submission offline.
What the board did and did not do: The board did not open an investigation at the meeting and did not agree to take enforcement action; it accepted the written material and permitted the extended comment period. Commissioners advised the speakers on alternative channels for federal civil-rights complaints (for example, the FBI) and emphasized the limits of the county commission over independently elected law-enforcement officials.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,055 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit