The Capitola City Council on July 24 reviewed its existing code of conduct policy and gave staff and the city attorney direction to draft clarified complaint and investigation procedures for future council consideration.

Staff presented the city’s code of conduct background and said no specific policy changes were in the staff report; instead they asked for direction. The staff report and subsequent council discussion highlighted three areas staff recommended refining: (1) clearer language on use of city letterhead, (2) a documented complaint and review process focused on member conduct (not policy votes), and (3) residency verification and bylaws for advisory bodies.

Multiple speakers urged stronger accountability. Kevin Grier told the council he believed recent remarks by an individual council member had violated the code’s civility language and called for a formalized accountability process including a defined complaint submission route, investigation steps and consequences such as censure or removal from committee assignments. Another commenter suggested a transparency step to notify the public when elected officials enter legal transactions that could affect their status.

Council discussion produced a number of consensual directions: the city attorney will review complaints submitted to the city and advise the council on any legal issues implicated; the council asked staff to prepare an updated draft policy that includes timelines for handling complaints, an option allowing a minimum threshold of council members (the council discussed two members as a trigger for placing a complaint on an agenda, with at least a majority required for a finding), confidentiality protections for initial reviews and specified response steps to complainants. Council asked staff to return with a marked draft for council consideration.

Why it matters: The code of conduct governs councilmember behavior and public expectations for civility and transparency. Council direction creates a pathway to standardize how complaints are handled and how the body documents outcomes. No disciplinary action was taken that night; the council asked staff and the city attorney to produce a revised policy for a future meeting.