Staunton council holds closed meeting on contract negotiations and city manager performance; certification follows

5482942 · July 26, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council entered closed session July 24 to discuss a public contract for construction services and the city manager’s performance under Virginia Code §2.2-3711; after reconvening, council certified compliance with the statute.

Staunton City Council entered a closed session during its July 24 work session to discuss the award of a public contract for construction services where open discussion would adversely affect the city’s bargaining position, and to discuss the city manager’s performance, citing Virginia Code §2.2‑3711(A)(29) and §2.2‑3711(A)(1).

Council moved into closed session during the work session; subsequent roll call votes to enter and to reconvene were recorded. After the closed session the council reconvened in open session and each member certified, to the best of their knowledge, that only lawfully exempted public business as identified in the motion was discussed.

Discussion versus decision: the transcript documents only that a closed meeting took place for the stated purposes and that the council certified compliance on reconvening. No contract award details or personnel performance determinations were disclosed in open session during the recorded meeting.

Next steps: where required by code or procurement rules, any formal contract awards or personnel actions that must be taken in open session will be scheduled and publicly noticed; the council’s certification of the closed session is part of the meeting record.