Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Parole hearing continued and counsel appointed after identity dispute

June 04, 2025 | Committee on Parole, Boards & Commissions, Organizations, Executive, Louisiana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Parole hearing continued and counsel appointed after identity dispute
The Committee on Parole in Baton Rouge continued a preliminary parole revocation hearing on Wednesday, June 4, and ordered appointed counsel after the person before the panel disputed the identity shown in records and refused to sign a revocation questionnaire.

The action matters because it halted a final finding on probable cause and ensured the subject will have a lawyer at the next proceeding. Board members said they would assign counsel under the Board’s indigency procedures and continue the hearing to allow counsel time to prepare.

At the start of the session the subject declined to sign the Louisiana Board of Parole revocation questionnaire. The subject told the panel, referring to the questionnaire, “Yes, sir. I did,” when asked if he had refused to sign. During questioning he also said he was known to others as “King” and disputed the name shown in the board’s certificate. Board members paused the hearing, went into executive session to review records, and when the panel returned said the certificate in the file indicated the person had signed and was on parole.

After the review a board member moved to continue the preliminary hearing and have appointed counsel assigned; the motion was seconded. The board announced that, as of 09:00 the next morning, the hearing would be continued and counsel would be appointed; until further action the subject remained in custody. The board said that if probable cause is found after a properly represented preliminary hearing the case will return to the board for further action.

This was a procedural continuation; the board did not make a final revocation determination at the June 4 meeting. The board cited its authority to consider appointed counsel requests under U.S. Supreme Court guidelines when an indigency claim is raised.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Louisiana articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI