Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears results of $140,000 community development grant program; staff explores sidewalk options with leftover funds
Summary
Staff reported that the city spent $124,660 of a $140,000 community development grant program to fund 18 projects (17 businesses supported), and council members discussed using remaining or other economic development funds for targeted sidewalk repairs or a new sidewalk grant program.
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff presented the results of a community development grant program that funded small facade, signage and landscaping projects for downtown businesses and nonprofits.
Charlie, the city administrator, summarized the program at the council meeting and said the city allocated $140,000 for the initiative with maximum awards of $5,000 for nonprofits and $10,000 for businesses. Staff said the program authorized 18 grants, supported 17 businesses, and spent $124,660; one project did not complete in time for reimbursement.
Why it matters: Council members praised the visual improvement to downtown and said the program supports economic revitalization. Several council members and residents urged staff to consider how leftover funds or future economic development allocations might be used for sidewalk repair or a parallel small grant program to help homeowners and businesses address hazardous sidewalks.
Details and discussion: The presentation included before‑and‑after photos of grant recipients such as Schaffner, the Seadrill Museum, Double Barrel Barbecue, the Boys and Girls Club, and others. Staff credited direct, hands‑on help from program manager Kelly and a summer intern who photographed results. Councilman Lavaca and others asked whether leftover economic development funds could be reallocated to a sidewalk rehab program; staff said there is money in the broader economic development set‑aside but no program has been formally programmed and that sidewalk replacement is expensive and requires prioritization.
Public comment: Resident Nora Peterson told the council she reviewed application materials and urged the city to continue the program and work with nonprofits on gaps that remain after this round of funding.
Outcome: No formal action was taken; staff said they will return with options for sidewalk priorities and further discussions about program replication.

