Town staff told meeting participants that Land Court is conducting a review that has delayed foreclosure proceedings on the defunct American Tissue property and that, when the case reaches the town, the town will have a limited window to decide whether to keep or sell the property. "We are waiting on Land Court. It's their—it's on their side of the fence right now. We put in the paperwork in 2022 to move foreclosure forward and let's get this done with," a town staff member said. The matter matters because the town will have to make a quick, formal decision once Land Court completes its work: "But when it does get here, we need to do it quick. We need to decide whether you're gonna keep it or sell it within a short period of time, and that's gonna be a board decision because of the new legislation," the same town staff member said. The staff member said the town filed the paperwork to pursue foreclosure in 2022 and that Land Court is doing due diligence, including locating parties and digging into records for a defunct business. "Once it gets to us, the land court will send us a final notice saying they now have 60 to respond. If they don't pay, now you can move forward, and we will be turning it over to you," the staff member said; the speaker did not specify the units for "60." Lucas, who said he had called Land Court, described the agency's role differently: "They said that it's up to the town to set the date. Land Court gives it to the defendant, and if the defendant agrees, then we move forward," he said, adding that Land Court sends a date to the defendant and the town must propose a date to the attorney and the defendant. Town staff emphasized the complexity of foreclosing on a business rather than a residence: the company was defunct and Land Court has to search corporate records and find all relevant parties before closing the case. The staff member said American Tissue "isn't one of them" that is ready for a town decision and that the case "is not close" to being ready for disposition. There was no formal vote or motion during the discussion; speakers described the current status as procedural and dependent on Land Court's actions. No specific statute or ordinance was cited during the remarks; speakers referred generally to "Land Court" proceedings and to "new legislation" that shortens the time the town will have to make a disposition decision once the court transfers the case. The town provided no timeline for when Land Court's review might finish. The discussion ended with an instruction-like note that, once Land Court completes its review, town leaders will need to act quickly to meet the statutory timing constraints flagged by staff.