Sandpoint forester pushes tighter prohibited tree list, recommends limits on maples and ash

5474744 · July 25, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City forester Eric Bush proposed focusing the Arboriculture Manual on a short prohibited-tree list rather than an exhaustive approved list, recommended restricting Acer plantings to reduce disease risk and urged adding ash and known weak-wood cultivars to a ban.

Sandpoint’s city forester told the Urban Forestry Commission on July 24 that the Arboriculture Manual should emphasize a clear list of prohibited street trees rather than attempt an exhaustive approved-species catalog. Eric Bush said a long approved list would inevitably miss species people might plant and would discourage suitable, locally available specimens. “It’s much more important that we have a tight prohibited street tree list than a tight approved street tree list,” Bush said during the meeting. Bush reviewed species currently in the city’s prohibited list as written in existing code and the urban forestry management plan: boxelder, cottonwood, poplar, willow, mountain ash (initially listed), American elm, fruit and nut trees, Ailanthus (tree-of-heaven) and bigleaf maple. He told commissioners he would remove mountain ash from the prohibition and treat it on a case-by-case basis. He also said the management plan recommends a temporary prohibition on planting additional maples (Acer) because maples make up roughly 20–25% of Sandpoint’s canopy and that heavy reliance on one genus increases the risk of catastrophic canopy loss if a pest or disease arrives. Bush described a possible approach for a temporary ban on new Acer plantings, with exceptions for dwarf or ornamental varieties such as some Japanese maples, and suggested the commission consider a short “encouraged” list of species (for example, transmission-line-friendly trees) rather than a long approved list. The commission discussed referencing established technical materials rather than reprinting them in full; Bush said he plans to include digestible planting and maintenance guidance and to reference the U.S. Forest Service and ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) best-practice materials where copyright and legal review permit. He said any revised manual will go through legal review before adoption. No formal vote on the manual was taken; the item will return as the draft is refined.