Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Essex Junction moves to treat many code violations as civil offenses; council adopts changes pending legal review
Summary
Council adopted amendments to municipal code chapters 9 and 18 to expand civil-enforcement mechanisms, authorize municipal officials to issue civil tickets, and clarify definitions of junk and construction waste; adoption was made pending a legal review requested at the meeting.
The Essex Junction City Council adopted amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 9 (enforcement procedures) and Chapter 18 (junk and property maintenance) that expand the use of civil enforcement and clarify responsibilities for property upkeep, city staff said.
Chris, the staff presenter, told the council the package designates additional code chapters as civil rather than criminal violations, standardizes penalty amounts, permits the zoning administrator and designees to issue civil violation tickets, clarifies construction-waste definitions and extends litter- and junk-maintenance responsibility to occupants and lessees as well as owners. “The city's interest is solving the junk problem, not to try to kick people out of their homes,” Chris said. He added the changes create a pathway for staff to enforce problems directly rather than relying solely on property owners to evict occupants.
The amendments also add technical edits recommended by the city attorney, require backyard composters be maintained to avoid public-health risks or vermin, and remove references to an ordinance appeals board that no longer exists.
During public comment, resident Steve Eustace asked how the city would handle items placed on someone else’s property; staff said enforcement generally focuses on private-property owners except where material is in the city right-of-way, and that the enforcement process includes warnings and time to remedy before fines are applied. “It would be quite unlikely that a property would be hit with fines just for an occasional issue,” Chris said.
Council members clarified implementation questions and sought a legal opinion about consistency of the municipal-officer/designee language across related ordinances; the council adopted the amendments "as presented pending legal review" so staff can proceed while attorneys confirm whether wording should be adjusted.
Formal action: the council moved and seconded a motion to adopt the amendments to Chapters 9 and 18 as presented, pending legal review. The motion carried on a voice vote with no nays.
Effect: The amendments change enforcement options and expand staff authority to issue civil tickets in appropriate cases; staff said they will return with any legal edits recommended by the city attorney.
