Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ami Metering Contract topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County proposes contract with Jefferson Electric to finish AMI metering in remote areas to avoid six-figure expense

5470189 · July 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff recommended contracting with Jefferson Electric to complete advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) in remote areas, saying the option would be far less expensive than completing the work in-house.

Public Works staff told the committee July 22 they want to enter a contract with Jefferson Electric to complete the county's AMI metering in remote areas rather than installing the equipment themselves.

"We're about 96 or so percent done with the county, but there are some remote areas that we can't get to," Mr. Gordon said. He told the committee that county staff explored installing base stations and towers themselves and estimated that option would be "in the $95,000 range." Staff presented Jefferson Electric's alternative as a lower-cost option.

Staff summarized Jefferson Electric's proposed costs in several ways during the meeting: a recurring fee described as "$1,600 a year or $16.40 annual cost" plus a one-time setup fee of $8,200, and an overall total cost described as "$9,840 to add this part ... out in the Winfield area." Staff recommended approval of the contract.

A motion to approve the item was moved and seconded on the consent agenda and adopted. The committee did not record a roll-call tally in the transcript.

Committee members did not present a detailed implementation schedule or vendor contract number during the meeting. Staff framed the item as a cost-saving measure to avoid the substantially higher estimated in-house install cost.