Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Prison To Teacher Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School board hears contentious presentation about program to place incarcerated people in elementary classrooms
Summary
A presenter described a program that would place incarcerated people directly into student‑teaching and solo teaching roles in kindergarten–fifth grade classrooms. Board members and public commenters raised safety and vetting concerns; no board action was taken.
The Terrebonne Parish School Board on March 8 heard a public presentation about a program described as placing incarcerated people "directly from prison into student teaching, and then solo teaching" in kindergarten through fifth‑grade classrooms, prompting sharply divided reaction from the public and board members.
The proposal was presented during the public comment portion of the meeting. "We are absolutely in favor of rehabilitation and second chances," the presenter told the board. The presenter read a document describing the categories of convictions that program organizers would consider and an email from a corrections official about teacher certification.
Board members expressed concern about safety and vetting. Several members said they were not prepared to support the concept after hearing the presentation. Board discussion focused on whether the program materials presented that night represented the program in full or only selected excerpts; one board member urged colleagues to "look at the whole program, not bits and pieces" before forming an opinion.
No motion to adopt or endorse the program was offered, and the board did not take formal action on the matter at the meeting. Board members said they wanted more complete documentation before any decision could be considered.
The presentation and most public comment took place during the public‑comment agenda item; board members explicitly discussed the proposal afterward and asked staff and colleagues to review the program materials.
The item closed without a vote; board members asked staff to provide any additional information they could obtain about certification and vetting requirements so the board could consider the matter at a future meeting.
Ending: The board did not adopt or reject the program at the March 8 meeting. Members who asked for more information said they would await a fuller package of documentation before considering any policy or procedural change.
