Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Site Plan Modification topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mesa planning board approves consent agenda, clarifies site-plan item for 45,000-square-foot industrial project

5466026 · July 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City of Mesa Planning and Zoning Board on July 23 unanimously approved its consent agenda and removed a previously listed amendment from the description of a zoning case, confirming the item is a major site-plan modification for an approximately 45,000-square-foot industrial development near South Signal Butte Road and East Germain Road.

The City of Mesa Planning and Zoning Board on July 23, 2025, unanimously approved its consent agenda and clarified the scope of a zoning case involving a proposed industrial development near South Signal Butte Road and East Germain Road.

A staff member told the board that “the amending condition of approval part is no longer part of the request; this is just a major site plan modification for the development of an approximately 45,000 square foot industrial development.” The item was listed on the consent agenda as item ZON25221 and referenced case ZON2400038 in the meeting record.

The consent agenda, approved in a single motion, included minutes from the July 9, 2025 planning and zoning board meeting (PZ25064) and the zoning case described as 4.1 acres located approximately 815 feet north of the northeast corner of South Signal Butte Road and East Germain Road. Board members confirmed the staff clarification before voting.

Board members present at roll call included Chair Ayers, Vice Chair Peterson, Board Member Pitcher, Board Member Montes, Board Member Blakeman, Board Member Carpenter and Board Member Farnsworth. During the vote each named member voiced “Aye”; the board recorded the action as unanimous.

No additional discussion items or updates were raised from downstairs before the board moved to adjourn. The board approved a motion to adjourn and closed the public hearing.