Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Strategic Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pearland ISD presents four‑year strategic plan framework; trustees ask for clearer objective measures
Summary
District leaders reviewed a draft 2025–2029 strategic plan organized around students, staff, community and finance; trustees requested clearer objective metrics to pair with subjective measures and directed staff to return with revisions for final approval Aug. 12.
District leadership presented a draft Pearland ISD strategic plan for 2025–2029 to the Board of Trustees on July 22, outlining four priorities — students, staff, community and finance — and proposing a balanced‑scorecard approach linking board goals to measurable objectives and long‑term outcomes.
Superintendent Dr. Berger described the plan as a "roadmap for us," saying it aligns board goals, strategic objectives and long‑term outcomes with department metrics and campus improvement plans. The plan sets targets such as increasing a composite "student connection" score from 62.3 to 70 over four years, raising an academic component score from 64% to 70%, and boosting college, career and military readiness (CCMR) from 87% to 95%.
Board members sought clearer, objective measures to accompany perception‑based metrics. Several trustees asked that measures such as safety perception be paired with concrete audits or external evaluations (door audits, drill validity, third‑party audits or TEA reviews) so that subjective scores are supported by verifiable data. Trustees also asked staff to clarify how surveys are sampled and weighted and how thresholds will be set for valid results.
Staff described a plan to publish a live dashboard and use a vendor (SurveySparrow) to standardize survey thresholds, roll up multiple indicators (student, staff and parent responses) and make progress visible to the public. The district also described operational targets: increasing business and community partnerships, expanding educator preparation partnerships from 9 to 15 and establishing an "advocacy ambassador" training cohort.
Trustees asked staff to refine several targets and definitions (for example, how the component score and growth metrics are calculated, and the precise meaning of "stakeholder" for communication measures). Dr. Berger said staff will incorporate suggested edits and return the revised document at the Aug. 12 board meeting for final approval. "We want to ensure transparency, equity and data‑informed leadership across the district," he said.
The board did not vote on the plan that evening; trustees directed staff to revise the draft and provide the board with additional documentation, calculations and a schedule of progress reporting before formal adoption.
