Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Town Meeting Remote topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wayland, Concord and others push to allow remote participation at open town meetings
Summary
Supporters from towns including Wayland and Concord urged the committee to let communities pilot remote access and remote participation at open town meetings, arguing the change would expand participation for parents, people with disabilities and working voters; opponents said remote access risks lowering deliberation quality.
Representatives, town moderators and civic groups told the joint committee Thursday they back legislation to allow open town meetings to permit remote audiovisual participation and voting for registered voters.
Wayland officials presented a technical plan used in town demonstrations that combines browser-based login, web audio/video, a clerk-run check‑in and a public audit table that lets remote voters confirm their submitted vote. "We're only asking for permission," David Bernstein, chair of Wayland's Electronic Voting Implementation Subcommittee, told the committee. "No software company will start full-scale deployment until the practice is legal."
Nut graf: Supporters said the change would let parents, caregivers, people with disabilities and workers who cannot attend lengthy evening meetings participate. Opponents warned it could weaken deliberation by allowing remote attendees to tune in only for votes and limit in‑person exchange.
Supporters, including Wayland Moderator Miranda Jones, Concord Moderator Carmen Rice and civic groups such as the League of Women Voters, said remote participation has technical solutions for authentication, queueing and public auditability. Jones said Wayland and Concord would be willing to pilot home‑rule experiments and report back to the legislature on lessons learned.
Opponents framed the change as a threat to an in‑person deliberative tradition. In-person critics said town meeting is one of the last forums where neighbors speak directly, and that remote access allows voters to avoid listening or to vote while multitasking. "Sitting at home, a voter can disengage from discussion and monitor progress so they can show up only for the vote," Erica Cole testified.
Ending: Legislators asked operational questions about cost, staffing and safeguards. Wayland representatives estimated vendor rental costs ranging from about $20,000 to $40,000 for large meetings and suggested pay-per-use models or local purchase; they said incremental town-staff costs would be modest. The committee did not take a vote and will receive home-rule petitions and written materials for follow-up review.
