Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Proponent files proposal to place automatic sprinklers requirement for adult family homes when more than six adults reside

July 24, 2025 | Building Code Council, Governor's Office - Boards & Commissions, Executive, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Proponent files proposal to place automatic sprinklers requirement for adult family homes when more than six adults reside
A proposal to add an explicit automatic fire-sprinkler requirement for adult family homes that serve more than six adults was filed and posted for the 2024 International Residential Code rulemaking, TAG staff said.

Quinn Tye, a building official attending as an alternate, described the filing as an effort to place the sprinkler requirement in the IRC text so building officials and designers do not have to cross-reference Department of Social and Health Services rules and the Revised Code of Washington. "My proposal is to add automatic fire sprinklers in this section because it's already required for adult family homes when you are exceeding six adults, per the RCW," Quinn said during the meeting.

Staff noted the proposal appears in the public submissions and will be treated as a public proposal; the TAG cannot take formal action on it until it is formally routed for TAG review and the TAG conducts deliberations. Angela Haupt, TAG chair, and staff said the proposal will be on the agenda after the TAG schedules follow-up meetings and completes review of the existing-amendments and significant-changes reports.

Why it matters: adult family homes are regulated both by state statutes and by building and life-safety codes. Clarifying the code text can reduce confusion for permit applicants and reviewers about where sprinkler requirements are documented.

The proposal was identified in staff remarks as “proposal 29” on the posted list; no vote or formal TAG amendment action was taken during the meeting.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI