Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Benefit Enhancement Career Choice topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board declines further action on a narrow benefit-enhancement issue affecting a small group of rehired retirees

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board decided not to pursue further action on a narrow issue involving nine members who retired from LEOFF Plan 2, were active in other plans on the statutory cut-off date, and may be ineligible for a tiered multiplier choice; staff will not prepare a comprehensive briefing at this time.

The LEOFF Plan 2 Board on July 23 determined no further action was warranted on a narrowly identified issue arising from the 2022 benefit enhancement. Board staff had identified nine members who retired from LEOFF Plan 2, then joined membership in a non-LEOFF retirement plan prior to the board's February 1, 2021 eligibility cutoff for the benefit choice; those members currently appear eligible only for the lump-sum version of the benefit and, in some cases, are unable to collect that lump sum while actively contributing to another retirement plan.

Staff explained the background: the 2022 benefit enhancement gave retirees a choice between a tiered multiplier (for active members on the cutoff date) and a lump-sum payment (for retirees as of that date). Because some LEOFF retirees later became active in other retirement systems, a small subset found themselves categorized as active for the cutoff and therefore limited to the lump-sum option — and under current law cannot receive the lump sum while actively contributing to another state retirement plan.

The board discussed whether to commission a comprehensive briefing that would (a) identify all affected members, (b) estimate interest owed where lump sums remain unpaid, and (c) consider policy options. After discussion, a board member moved for no further action; the motion was seconded and carried by voice vote, and staff will not prepare a comprehensive report at this time. Staff noted that the dataset used to identify nine members was run a month or two prior to the meeting and may change if re-run.