Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Device Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Concord committee reviews draft student cell phone policy, debates enforcement and handbook alignment
Summary
Committee heard a first read of a draft policy to ban phones between start and end of school day with exceptions for IEPs and transportation; members urged handbook cross‑references and clearer enforcement language.
The Concord School Committee held a first reading of a draft student cell‑phone policy that would bar cell phones between the start and end of the school day, with exceptions for students with IEPs, during bus transportation, and for after‑school sponsored events.
The draft author (name not specified in transcript) presented the policy as a first read and asked the committee for feedback; committee members generally supported the policy language but pressed for clearer alignment with the district handbook and more detail on enforcement and consequences.
One committee member asked that the policy explicitly reference the handbook’s disciplinary procedures so families would understand how enforcement would be handled. “All disciplinary decisions and enforcement related to this policy will be determined by the school administration as outlined in the handbook,” the committee discussed inserting as a cross‑reference. Staff said the district consolidated its handbooks last year and that handbook language could be updated to reflect any approved policy.
Committee members debated enforcement approaches. Some said they preferred cooperative, non‑punitive approaches that rely on teacher intervention and parental education; others said a mere polite request to put phones away would lack sufficient “teeth.” Committee members also discussed whether phones should be allowed on buses; one member noted METCO and families who rely on phones during long bus trips for safety and communications.
The committee agreed to revise the draft to add handbook cross‑references and to return the policy for a future vote. Members flagged related issues for future discussion, including whether to include smartwatches and other internet‑capable devices in the same rule and how building‑level discretion would be implemented.
No final vote on the policy was taken at the meeting; staff will draft handbook cross‑references and return the policy at a subsequent meeting.
