Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Growth Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors and candidates urge council to reject Reserve at Johnson Ranch growth-policy amendment
Summary
At a July 21 public hearing, residents, a council candidate and longtime neighbors raised safety, traffic, environmental and infrastructure concerns about a proposed Kalispell growth-policy amendment to allow a mixed-use, high-density node at Old Reserve Drive and Stillwater Road; the hearing record will return to the council Aug. 4.
Kalispell — Residents and local candidates urged the Kalispell City Council on July 21 to deny a proposed amendment to the city’s growth policy that would create a neighborhood business and high-density residential node at the northwest corner of Old Reserve Drive and Stillwater Road.
The proposal would change the Kalispell Growth Policy to allow annexation, initial zoning and higher-density development for property at 1053 Stillwater Road. Opponents told the council the site is unsafe, poorly served by roads, near gravel-mining operations and would overload schools and emergency services.
"You’re going to cause more death, more tragedies, and it's gonna be — I will hold y'all accountable if anybody gets killed at this intersection," said Claire, a West Valley resident who spoke during the hearing. Claire cited prior local crash history at the intersection and said notice about the hearing had been inadequate for many older residents.
Bob White, a longtime West Valley resident, described the mix of existing industrial (gravel and mining) uses and the proposed high-density homes as incompatible. "Slamming 500 living units into an already desperately underdeveloped infrastructure area is a recipe for disaster," White said, citing traffic, road geometry and emergency-services impacts.
George Waters, who lives on Harvest View Lane, criticized the proposal’s plan to site commercial uses on Stillwater and said the road already functions as a high-speed bypass. "How can you build 300 houses and a commercial area on that small, narrow road? It just doesn't make sense. It's very unsafe," Waters said.
Kyle Voigtlander, a candidate for Ward 3 who also spoke, said he opposes the subdivision as proposed but urged smarter, phased planning rather than outright refusal. "I'm not saying don't build. What I'm saying is let's be smart about it," Voigtlander said, pointing to prior developments that left infrastructure partially built during market downturns.
The council opened the hearing on the growth-policy amendment and accepted public comment. The item will return on the Aug. 4 council agenda for further consideration and any formal action; council staff noted the process includes annexation and initial zoning steps that require multiple hearings.
Speakers at the hearing raised consistent concerns: vehicle speeds on Stillwater Road, the presence of heavy truck traffic tied to gravel operations, the proximity of West Valley School, potential additional call volume for first responders, and lack of identified impact fees or commitments to address school capacity and road upgrades. Several speakers asked that the city coordinate planning with county and state agencies before approving higher density for the site.
The council did not take a final vote on the amendment on July 21; staff said the item will be on the Aug. 4 agenda at 7 p.m. in council chambers for further public comment and council action.
