Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Jail Tax Correspondence topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cochise County Jail District approves consent items; supervisor asks that sheriff correspondence on jail tax be shared immediately
Summary
The Cochise County Jail District voted 3-0 on July 22 to approve consent agenda items 1 and 2, and a supervisor asked staff to immediately forward any correspondence from the sheriff's office about the proposed jail tax to the board.
The Cochise County Jail District voted 3-0 on July 22 to approve consent agenda items 1 and 2. During the meeting a supervisor asked staff to forward any correspondence from the sheriff's office about the proposed jail tax — and related communications from the county attorney or animal-shelter staff — to the board as soon as it is received.
The vote came during a brief session convened in the Supervisor's hearing room. Supervisors Crossby (District 1), Gomez (District 2) and Antinori (District 3) were present in person; there was no call to the public on jail-district business.
A staff member identified as the deputy county administrator told the board, “We received his letter of support yesterday to go into the publicity pamphlet.” That statement referred to a letter from the sheriff supporting the proposed jail tax and to including that letter in the county's pamphlet about the measure. A supervisor asked whether anything earlier had been sent; staff responded, “Yes. I believe there was.”
During discussion, a supervisor requested broader immediate distribution to the full board of any correspondence from the sheriff's office and the county attorney, and said that the request should also cover communications related to animal shelters. The deputy county administrator acknowledged the request with the single-word reply, “Understood.”
A motion to approve consent agenda items 1 and 2 was made and seconded; the board then voted to approve the motion, with the chair announcing the result as “Motion carries 3 to 0.” The meeting adjourned and the next scheduled meeting was announced as the regular Board of Supervisors meeting.
Why it matters: The sheriff's letter of support will appear in the county's publicity pamphlet on the proposed jail tax, and the supervisor's request seeks to ensure that supervisors receive relevant correspondence from law-enforcement and legal offices promptly so they can consider it ahead of future action or public materials. The transcript does not record any formal action directing staff to change distribution procedures; staff's acknowledgement was verbal only.
