Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge council to intervene after planning commission votes on comp plan research; council and staff seek clarity
Summary
At a public comment session Fort Thomas residents said the planning commission acted quickly on research findings and bypassed broader council discussion about conducting a new public survey for the comprehensive plan; councilmembers asked for a meeting with the commission before major changes.
Resident Joan Ferris urged the City Council to view the full May 21 planning and zoning meeting video and said the commission “reduced to ashes” council-level discussion about commissioning a new public survey to inform an updated comprehensive plan by voting, she said, to accept existing research without broader review.
Ferris said the planning commission read a staff memo and approved a motion quickly, and she told council that the commission’s action appeared to short-circuit recent council conversations about a new survey and public outreach. The resident asked whether the commission’s vote would take effect if the council did not act within any statutory window.
City staff told council the commission voted that the existing research was still relevant but had not yet adopted new goals and objectives; staff said the next step was for council and the planning commission to meet to review proposed goal-and-objective changes before the commission adopted them. The staff member said the commission’s research vote did not, by itself, complete goal-and-objective decisions and emphasized that larger changes would return to council under the city’s process.
Why it matters: residents said the comprehensive plan guides zoning and land-use decisions and urged council oversight and public outreach before planning commission actions appear to change plan direction.
What was said: Ferris said the 2015 survey is now 10 years old and “was not valid when they used it five years ago,” arguing a new survey should inform any comprehensive-plan update. The staff member replied that the commission had voted on the research component only and that council planned to meet with the commission before any major changes were finalized.
Next steps: staff said they would forward the research materials and that council members should decide whether to meet with planning commission members before the commission votes on goals and objectives. No binding change to the comprehensive plan was adopted by council at the meeting; planning commission actions on research were reported as taken but further steps remain.
